Friday, November 1, 2024
Home Blog Page 1503

BN Verdict: Lomachenko is still very much Lomachenko | Boxing News


SOMETIMES, when watching Vasiliy Lomachenko in action, one can’t help but wonder whether in the end only his ambition and the pressure on him to find challenges has dirtied what could have been a pristine – yes, even perfect – record.

It could be argued, of course, that this is just the nature of the game, or the beast, and that every boxer must at some stage balance risk against reward. Yet with Lomachenko, 18-3 (12), there remains a feeling that his professional record is indicative more of the pressure on him to keep testing himself than, let’s say, the brilliance he has shown every time he sets foot in a boxing ring. A more stubborn fighter, for instance, may have found it easier saying “no”, or looking the other way when presented with a test. However, this approach has never been the approach of Lomachenko; not when fighting Orlando Salido in his first world title fight in pro bout number two, and not when moving from featherweight to super-featherweight and then finally to lightweight just to make things interesting and give others a chance.

Now at lightweight, where he has been since 2018, Lomachenko is a champion (IBF) again. That, to anyone who has ever watched Lomachenko perform will come as no surprise, but when taking into account the fact he is now 36, and that he has also just beaten an Australian in Australia, this latest achievement of Lomachenko’s takes on new and greater meaning. Indeed, for some it represents his swansong; either his final achievement or the springboard to what will become his final achievement.

Beating George Kambosos, the aforementioned Australian, was never really in doubt – again, to those who know of Lomachenko’s quality – but to do it the way Lomachenko did, dominating and halting the Australian in round 11, was evocative of some of Lomachenko’s best wins and therefore provides hope that he still has something left.

The finish in round 11, for example, was as good a finish as Lomachenko has managed for some time, particularly as a lightweight. With investments made early, and with Kambosos by now bloodied and hurt, Lomachenko ruthlessly dug a southpaw left hand into his opponent’s body in the 11th, which caused Kambosos to turn away from the action and take a knee. He would continue, of course, such is his bravery, but Kambosos was unable to protect himself, or even that same spot on his body, when the action resumed. As a result, Lomachenko went after him, throwing only left hands to the midsection, and was soon wheeling away in victory following the referee’s intervention.

Lomachenko throws his left hand (Mikey Williams/Top Rank)

Of all the things to be taken from tonight, that, the nature of the finish, was most encouraging for those still in awe of Lomachenko. After all, in pursuing Kambosos in this way, and by not settling for a decision win, Lomachenko showed he has both the gears and the desire to still impress and finish and, yes, take risks. It is always a risk to try finishing a fight, even a fight as one-sided as tonight’s, and yet Lomachenko remains happy to take such risks. Perhaps, to some degree, he is still haunted by what happened in his previous fight, a close decision loss against Devin Haney, and wanted to make absolutely certain this time around. Perhaps Lomachenko is losing faith in the ability of judges, and boxing fans, to know and appreciate what it is they are watching.

For those who do understand, there aren’t many sights as alluring as Lomachenko on song. Few fighters, whether the ones currently active or ones from the past, can match his level of technical prowess and few fighters can boast his array of punches, either. Few fighters, in fact, are able to match Lomachenko in any department, which is precisely why, in order to somewhat level the playing field, the Ukrainian has spent his career handicapping himself and giving opponents certain advantages (usually in weight, or timing) to ensure his fights are remotely interesting and competitive.

Lomachenko, you see, is just that good. He has, in fact, always been that good. Capable of beating world-class fighters from day one of his professional career, one of the only questions surrounding him these days is this: Was/is he too good for his own good? Meaning, it’s hard to imagine a fighter as seemingly perfect as Vasiliy Lomachenko sporting anything but a perfect record (all things being equal), yet 18-3 is clearly not an accurate representation of perfection. Which, in turn, begs a follow-up question: Is it in the end only Lomachenko’s innate desire to entertain and test himself that has seen him suffer setbacks and occasionally bite off more than he can chew?

Possibly. Either way, it’s this very desire to entertain and test himself that makes Vasiliy Lomachenko a fighter so easy to not only watch but admire.



Source link

'No deal was done' before Elphicke defected to Labour – Ashworth | Conservative Home

0






Source link

Cameron Defends Being a Better Communicator Than Sunak

0






Cameron Defends Being a Better Communicator Than Sunak – Guido Fawkes






































Cameron Defends Being a Better Communicator Than Sunak








Home Page


Next Story





















Source link

Anita Baker Cancels Atlanta Concert MINUTES Before Showtime, Fan Blasts “Her Bald Headed A**”

0


Anita Baker fans were all sorts of excited to see the legend last night (May 11) in Atlanta. However, attendees were given a rude awakening, because the ‘Sweet Love’ belter’s concert was canceled minutes before showtime and left many of them feeling sour.

Full story below…

The songbird was set to nest on stage at the State Farm Arena with the aptly titled show ‘An Evening with Anita Baker.’

However, per many attendees, the following alert went out minutes before the show was scheduled to start and when doors had already opened. It read:

“Due to late, unforeseen circumstances, tonight’s “An Evening with Anita Baker” event featuring eight-time Grammy Award-winning superstar Anita Baker set to take place at State Farm Arena has been canceled. Refunds will be returned at the point of purchase.”

Suffice it to say, fans were less than impressed. One disappointed attendee took to social media to blast Baker’s “bald-headed a**.

The woman vented, saying:

“I’m p*ssed! Anita’s bald-headed a** canceled the concert. I been waiting for her since January and her bald-headed a** canceled like the concert. Look at us. We all standing out here ready, waiting, and her bald-headed a** canceled the concert last minute. P*ssed!”

Peep the clip:

It’s far from the first time that Baker has been embroiled in drama related to her live offerings.

Indeed, she made headlines in earnest after she sensationally dropped Babyface from her 2023 tour. She also was on the receiving end of critique for her “brutal” performance of the US National Anthem at the NFC Championship Game last year.

Yikes, yikes, and yikes!





Source link

Natalie Elphicke Defection Not An ‘Error Of Judgement’ By Keir Starmer, Says Jon Ashworth

0


Keir Starmer did not make an “error of judgement” when he accepted former Tory MP Natalie Elphicke into the Labour Party, shadow cabinet minister Jonathan Ashworth has said.

Elphicke, the MP for Dover, shocked Westminster when she sensationally defected to Labour on Wednesday.

But many Labour MPs are unhappy given her right-wing views on immigration and previous support for her ex-husband who was found guilty of sexual assault.

According to The Sunday Times, in 2020 Elphicke also lobbied the justice secretary, Robert Buckland, on behalf of her then husband Charlie.

Elphicke is reported to have pressed Buckland for his case to be moved to a less high profile court to avoid public scrutiny.

Challenged over the report on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme, Ashworth said Elphicke had dismissed it as “nonsense”.

“If Robert Buckland has evidence or has more to say then let’s hear what he says,” Ashworth, the shadow paymaster general, said.

But he was asked: “Don’t these allegations start to create a sense maybe Keir Starmer and the Labour leadership team have made an error of judgement?”

Ashworth said: “No, no, no, no, no, no.”

“I think whatNatalie Elphicke’s crossing of the floor reveals is the extent to which we are witnessing a disintegrating and decaying Conservative government,” he said.

“More broadly what she has done – like thousands and thousands of conservatives across the country – she has shifted to he Labour Party because she can see after 14 years of failure its time for change.”

But Labour MP Zarah Sultana told the same programme: “She was a member of the European Reform Group; she voted for Liz Truss in the leadership, she’s at odds when it comes to fire and rehire, she has attacked trade unions and their activities.

“So unless she’s had the biggest Damascene conversion ever, I just don’t buy it.”

Labour MP Jess Philips, a former shadow domestic violence minister, also told Sky News last week Elphicke’s admission to Labour was “a bit like being punched in the gut”.

While former Labour leader Neil Kinnock said Labour should be “choosy to a degree about who we allow to join” as while it is a “very broad church” churches “have walls and there are limits”.

Usually when an MP defects to another party, it is the one they leave that comes under the most pressure. But while Elphicke’s decision to jump ship was a blow to Rishi Sunak, it is Labour that has faced more questions.

David Cameron, the foreign secretary, told the BBC: “Here was actually quite a sort of right-wing MP who had absolutely no affinity with Labour policies or Labour people or Labour philosophy and they welcome her in, I think it says a huge amount about the Labour Party.

“If you don’t have a plan, if you don’t have policies, if you don’t have things you stand for, you will literally fall for anything. And so Natalie Elphicke is now frankly a Labour press office problem, I expect their phones are ringing off the hook this morning, it’s not a Conservative problem anymore.”





Source link

Real Madrid Interested In Florian Wirtz Signing For 2025 -Report | Independent Newspaper Nigeria


German attacking midfielder Florian Wirtz has reportedly caught the eye of Real Madrid, with Los Blancos planning a move for the Bayer Leverkusen youngster in the summer of 2025, according to Spanish outlet MARCA.

The 21-year-old Wirtz has been instrumental in Leverkusen’s current success, their best season to date. He has impressed with an 18-goal, 19-assist performance across 46 appearances. Wirtz’s contract with Leverkusen runs until 2027, meaning Real Madrid will need to make a significant offer to secure his transfer.

Wirtz’s potential fit at Real Madrid presents an interesting tactical question. His preferred position as an attacking midfielder overlaps with that of another star, Jude Bellingham. While Wirtz possesses the versatility to play on either wing, his most impactful role comes in supporting the strikers. If Real Madrid does secure his signing, it will be intriguing to see how manager Carlo Ancelotti —or whoever is in charge then— utilizes both Wirtz and Bellingham to maximize their attacking potential.



Source link

Claims Charles ‘refused to meet Harry’ rubbished by insider in five-word verdict

0


A source close to Buckingham Palace has defended over claims that he refused to meet his estranged son while he was over in London for Invictus Games events.

Earlier this week a spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex said that the King’s schedule was too busy to allow for time to meet, explaining: “In response to the many inquiries and continued speculation on whether or not the Duke will meet with his father while in the UK this week, it unfortunately will not be possible due to His Majesty’s full programme. The Duke of course is understanding of his father’s diary of commitments and various other priorities and hopes to see him soon.”

An insider hit back in defence of His Majesty in a five-word verdict, even making a cheeky reference to the Oprah Winfrey interview as they insisted: “Recollections may vary once again.”

They told The Times: “While it is true that the King is understandably wary about meeting with Harry, given the publicity circus that seems to surround all such visits, he did of course agree to see his son at the most vulnerable moment of his illness [back in February] and at very short notice.

“While he was hardly going to roll out the red carpet the moment this Invictus trip was announced, with doctors advising him to focus on his treatment and recovery, the idea that he refused to find space in his diary … well, let’s say recollections may vary once again.”

THIS IS A LIVE BLOG. SCROLL BELOW FOR THE LATEST UPDATES…



Source link

James Cleverly prompts ridicule for praise of Susan Hall  

0


‘Fortunately, London saw through her vitriolic and personal attacks and massive lies… What an embarrassing tweet.’

Sadiq Khan won an historic third term in City Hall, beating his main rival, Conservative Susan Hall, by 276,000 more votes, and winning in nine of the 14 constituencies in the May 2 mayoral elections.

Hall’s campaign to be London mayor attracted criticism, described as a ‘narrow and negative’ focus on ULEZ and crime. When criticising Khan’s record on crime, the councillor for Harrow claimed to have been a victim of pickpocketing on the underground. It later emerged her purse had been found wedged between seats on the Jubilee line with her £40 still intact.

Labour even called for an investigation into the fake driver fines that littered the capital, claiming that the London mayor was planning on introducing a pay-per-mile scheme, something that he had previously ruled out. The black and yellow penalty notices were created as part of Hall’s mayoral campaign.

The Tory candidate has also faced criticism over her social media activity. Campaigners raised concerns about her suitability for the role after footage emerged of her suggesting the Black community has “problems with crime.” During the contest, Hall was also accused of struggling to answer even the most basic questions.

Following the Tories’ crushing defeat, Paul Scully, Conservative MP for Sutton and Cheam, who ran to be his party’s mayoral candidate in 2023, criticised Hall’s campaign, labelling it as “negative” and showing “no aspiration” for the capital. The party has ‘got to do better’ in London, said Scully.

Despite the cross-party criticism of Hall’s campaign, James Cleverly praised the Conservative candidate.

“Thank you @Councillorsuzie for standing and campaigning so passionately on behalf of Londoners. The vitriolic and personal attacks never got you down,” the Home Secretary tweeted.

The tweet sparked ridicule, with onlookers pointing to the irony of Cleverly’s comments.

“Fortunately, London saw through her vitriolic and personal attacks and massive lies… What an embarrassing tweet,” was one comment.

“Miserable failure and a campaign marked by relentless personal attacks. She is a disgrace,” was another post.

“Hall’s campaign was an absolute disgrace of division and dishonesty. It was her own vitriol and personal attacks that lost it for her. Graceless and bitter concession speech. Nasty through and through,” was another comment.

This is not the first time that James Cleverly has defended Susan Hall. On BBC One’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg in September, the host referred to how, in 2019, Hall reposted a post from Katie Hopkins which referred to Sadiq Khan as the mayor of ‘Londonistan’ and a later tweet in February 2020, in which Hall liked a tweet depicting Enoch Powell, with the words, “it’s never too late to get London back.” Kuenssberg asked Cleverly if he was conformable with the comments and whether they represented the views of the modern Conservative Party. Dodging the question directly, the Home Secretary still managed to suggest that Hall had the backing of most senior Tories.

I know Susan and have worked with her for a long time. She is just like most of us in the Conservative Party. She is comfortable working with people of all ethnicities, and is passionate about making London safe and prosperous,” he said.

Following the May 2 mayoral election, Hall sparked ridicule for claiming she ‘so nearly’ defeated Sadiq Khan despite having lost by a record margin.

(Image credit: Lauren Hurley / No 10 Downing Street)





Source link

Biden Keeps Bouncing Between Trump and Shrinkflation — And It’s Enough to Give Voters Whiplash

0


PACIFIC PALISADES, Calif. — My opponent wants to end our democracy, rule as an autocrat … and by the way, did you notice my administration is cracking down on those outrageous airline luggage fees?

Such is the whiplash-inducing messaging from President Joe Biden’s White House and campaign as he seeks reelection, veering from warnings that his coup-attempting opponent would literally end the constitutional republic to boasts about how he is taking on snack food manufacturers who shrink their packages but charge the same price for them.

Often both elements ― the small-ball and the apocalyptic ― are present in the same speech, as they were in December, when Biden spoke before an audience of donors in a living room overlooking the Pacific Ocean.

Biden mentioned his expansion of the Affordable Care Act, his work to eliminate lead pipes from homes and the building of a high-speed rail line between Las Vegas and Los Angeles and then, minutes later, warned that the United States as we know it could end next year. “I truly believe the future of American democracy is at stake,” he said. “Not a joke.”

Ruth Ben-Ghiat, an authoritarianism researcher at New York University, acknowledged the seeming discordance of emphasizing more mundane issues when the country’s core principles are on the line. “Maybe he fears fatigue in the public,” she said.

Michael Fanone, one of the 140 police officers assaulted by Trump supporters at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, said Biden’s team is failing to explain to Americans the gravity of the situation.

“Donald Trump is not just a threat to democracy because he talks about grabbing pussies and speaks in hyperbole — he is a threat to democracy because of the things he tried to do as president of the United States,” Fanone said. “All those other issues are important, but they’re meaningless unless we have our democracy.”

Both the White House and Biden’s campaign say Biden has, in fact, made the ongoing assault on democracy the organizing principle of his tenure to date.

“An animating feature of this presidency has been about the preservation of democracy and our democratic, small-d institutions,” said White House communications director Ben LaBolt. “But it’s important to be responsive to the day-to-day needs and wants of the American people.”

Typical voters are deeply frustrated by things like access to health care and the “junk fees” charged by banks and airlines, he said. They want to see corporations who take advantage of consumers held accountable. And to a senior paying $35 a month for insulin, rather than several hundred dollars, drug price cuts aren’t “small ball,” he added — they’re a major quality of life improvement.

That analysis, in fact, is shared by political consultants across the spectrum, who say that Biden must show Americans what he is doing for them, not just warn what Trump will do to them, if he wants to win in November.

“When it comes to putting democracy on the ballot, does it resonate with the typical voter? No,” said Gunner Ramer, political director for the anti-Trump group the Republican Accountability Project. “Swing voters aren’t particularly happy with the economy.”

Left unstated in such advice, of course, is a disquieting understanding: that a significant slice of Americans, likely not a majority but certainly enough to swing an election, would not be that bothered if the United States were to transition to an autocracy, run by a “strongman” promising to just get things done.

“A significant share of the electorate is sympathetic to autocracy ― maybe 20 to 25% ― or, at a minimum, doesn’t have a problem with it,” said Jonathan Weiler, a University of North Carolina political scientist and co-author of “Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics,” a 2009 book that predicted the rise of someone like Trump.

And on this question, Weiler is joined by the only American president who tried to remain in power after losing his election: Trump himself.

Asked in a recent interview whether he understood why Americans were so upset by his talk about a dictatorship, Trump flatly rejected that premise. “I think a lot of people like it,” he told Time magazine.

From Charlottesville to Jan. 6

In his 2020 campaign, Biden made Trump’s anti-democratic impulses and his open admiration for dictators a key part of his argument against the Republican incumbent. Biden cited Trump’s assertion that there were “very fine people on both sides” of a violent, neo-Nazi protest in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017 as the moment that spurred his decision to run, and portrayed the remark as an example of what he called Trump’s fundamentally anti-American values.

In a January 2020 essay published in Foreign Affairs, Biden used the word “democracy” 16 times, promising to “reinvigorate our own democracy” in order to reclaim America’s role in countering autocracy around the world.

Just one year later, after having lost reelection by 7 million votes, Trump gave stunning proof to Biden and other critics’ most dire warnings: He attempted a coup, which failed when his vice president refused to go along with it and the police and National Guard eventually wrested control of the Capitol away from the mob Trump had riled up into attacking it.

From that day forward, Biden’s warnings about Trump and his allies’ continuing threat to American democracy became not merely speculative, but grounded in historical fact, with abundant archival video.

Yet as Biden’s reelection effort has coalesced, the existential peril that the country’s foundational principles continue to face has not been the singular foundational pillar of the campaign.

Biden’s recent speeches have instead focused more on his various achievements in office: passage of major legislation like a $1.2 trillion infrastructure law and a $280 billion package to invest in high-tech research and manufacturing, capping the cost of Medicare insulin prescriptions and going after airlines for charging travelers extra to check bags or seat families together, among other kitchen-table policies.

Campaign spokesperson Charles Lutvak said Biden has spoken about the threat to democracy repeatedly, and that it is a key part of his message. “We are running against a would-be dictator pledging to cut taxes for the billionaires and shiv the middle class, while gutting women’s freedom to make their own health care decisions on the way,” he said. “We can, will, and must talk about the full range of threats Trump poses to the very core values that our country was founded on.”

Lutvak and others note that Biden has, indeed, given several landmark speeches focused almost exclusively on American democracy.

On the first anniversary of the Capitol assault, Biden spoke from the scene of the insurrection and told America: “We’re engaged anew in a struggle between democracy and autocracy.”

Eight months later, heading into the 2022 midterms, Biden gave a prime-time address from Independence Hall in Philadelphia, in which he sounded the alarm about Trump and the cadre of election-denying candidates he had recruited for Senate and governors’ races. “Too much of what’s happening in our country today is not normal. Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic,” the president said.

And in Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, on the third anniversary of Trump’s coup attempt, Biden told his audience: “This is not rhetorical, academic, or hypothetical. Whether democracy is still America’s sacred cause is the most urgent question of our time, and it’s what the 2024 election is all about.”

In his everyday speeches, though, Biden has been more likely to talk about everything but the

At a March 19 campaign speech in Phoenix, Biden referred to Trump four times, attacking him for the way he disparaged Latinos, his tax cuts and his openness to Social Security cuts — without a word about Jan. 6.

In an April 24 speech to the Building Trades union, Biden hit Trump for having inherited his wealth, for favoring tax cuts that benefit the rich, for opposing unions, for claiming that wind turbines cause cancer, for mismanaging COVID, for denying climate change, for increasing the national debt and for leaving office with fewer jobs than when he entered. But he never brought up Trump’s attempt to remain in office despite losing the 2020 election.

And in a speech the following day in Syracuse to tout a resurgence of microchip manufacturing in the United States, Biden only mentioned Trump a single time, and that was to mock him for perennially touting “infrastructure week” but never delivering.

That lack of singular focus incenses former Illinois congressman Joe Walsh. After all, the Republican-turned-independent says, if, in a constitutional republic, your opponent is now currently talking about ruling as an autocrat, should not that be the one overriding message, all day and every day?

“This is a one-fucking-issue campaign: ‘I am your one line between our country and the end of democracy,’” said Walsh, who unsuccessfully challenged Trump for the GOP presidential nomination in 2020. “Win or die with that. The vast majority of Americans don’t want authoritarianism.”

Social scientists who study autocracies, though, aren’t quite so confident that Americans would straight-up reject a potential dictator who promises lower gasoline and grocery prices, and other tangible benefits.

Indeed, a recent Pew poll found that a quarter of Americans believe that an autocracy is a “very good” or “somewhat good” form of government, while another 28% think it’s only “somewhat bad.” Going even further, 15% of Americans surveyed said they think military rule would be good, and another 23% believe it would be only “somewhat bad.”

Weiler said the ones in the “somewhat bad” camps most likely have not thought the question through and are probably not that attuned to politics to begin with. “For this group, the Biden campaign believes that showing them how government can deliver in concrete terms to make their lives better is the best way to appeal to them, a kind of pocketbook approach to campaigning,” he said.

Boston College historian Heather Cox Richardson said that younger Americans have struggled through the Great Recession and then the COVID-19 pandemic, and that Biden may, as a starting point, need to persuade them about democracy’s intrinsic benefits.

“People who are under 50 have never seen a democracy that actually works for them. He is trying to emphasize that democracy can work for ordinary Americans, and also to remind everybody that this is a flight for the existence of democracy,” she said.

And Ben-Ghiat, whose book “Strongmen,” analyzes Trump in the context of the notorious dictators of the 20th century, said she, too, understands that many voters do not engage in intellectual comparisons between democracy and autocracy, which is why it is critical for Biden to reach them in other ways.

“He’s not somebody who doesn’t get it. He does get it,” she said of Biden. “We know that voters sometimes don’t think about big abstract things. They think about the price of gas and other things.”

That tactic is one Biden himself appreciates. In an October interview with ProPublica, the president noted that he won his first race for the Senate in 1972, the same election that saw Richard Nixon win reelection to the White House in a national landslide. The lesson he took away was that Democrats had a tendency to engage too much with party elites, and not enough with their core voters.

“A lot of the guys that I grew up with in Claymont, Delaware, in Scranton, Pennsylvania — they feel like they’re not being respected. Not so much by policy ― just by the failure to talk about their needs,” he said, explaining his rationale to speak about basic economic matters.

At the same time, Biden continues to make the hard sell on democracy for its own sake paired with warnings about looming authoritarianism to select audiences — including the journalists who cover him and Trump.

“Every single one of us has roles to play, a serious role to play in making sure democracy endures — American democracy. I have my role, but, with all due respect, so do you,” he told journalists gathered at the White House Correspondents Association dinner late last month. “So, tonight, I’d like to make a toast: to a free press, to an informed citizenry, to an America where freedom and democracy endure.”





Source link

Vandrezzer delighted with NNL safety


Vandrezzer have expressed their happiness after avoiding relegation from the Nigeria Premier Football League (NNL).

The Uyo club maintained their NNL status after defeating Coal City FC 3-2 in Enugu.

Vandrezzer finished in ninth position with 26 points from 22 games.

The club wrote on their X handle, “This season, we encountered obstacles that made our journey even more remarkable.

“Notably, our club missed two crucial games, resulting in a deduction of 6 points and goals.

“Despite this setback, our team showcased incredible resilience and determination, ultimately proving their worth in the highly competitive league.

“We want to express our heartfelt gratitude to our dedicated players, coaching staff, and our passionate fanbase for their unwavering support throughout the season.

“We are thrilled to have secured our place in the NNL despite the challenges we faced.

“Our victory is a testament to the spirit and dedication of everyone involved with the club.

“As we look forward to the next season, we aim to learn from our experiences and continue striving for excellence in the world of Nigerian football.

“Fans can anticipate more exciting matches and memorable moments as the Lions roar on in the NNL.

“We are proud of our journey and grateful to everyone who has been a part of it.”





Source link

Verified by MonsterInsights