Wednesday, October 30, 2024
Home Blog Page 1522

Motorsport Ireland Rally Academy members Creighton and McErlean battle it out in Portugal

0


Motorsport Ireland Rally Academy members Creighton and McErlean battle it out in Portugal

May 09, 2024


Two Motorsport Ireland Rally Academy members are set to go head-to-head in WRC2  machinery for the first time this year on Vodafone Rally de Portugal which gets underway on Thursday.

William Creighton, the current Junior World Rally Champion, will start this third World Rally Championship event of year on board a M-Sport Ford Fiesta Rally2. He will be joined on the gravel event by Josh McErlean who will get his 2024 WRC campaign  underway as he will pilot a Topsport World Rally Team Škoda Fabia RS Rally2 with returning co-driver James Fulton alongside.

The difficult gravel event will mark a new era in McErlean’s career, as he starts his third season in the World Rally Championship, but his first behind the wheel of a Škoda and his first in a new team. The event marks Creighton’s third event of year and while both drivers have gone head-to-head in past – most notably in the 2023 Rallye Monte Carlo when they both drove PCRS Rallysport-prepared Hyundai i20 Rally2 cars, this will be the first time they will race each other on opposing teams. The two drivers are backed by the Motorsport Ireland Rally Academy and the fact that both are driving for two of the most respected teams in the WRC service park shows what opportunities are available to young Irish talent under the academy’s development programme.

“I am super excited to start our WRC season and I feel comfortable in the relationship with Toksport and Škoda Motorsport which has started really well. It’s all so professionally run and a very positive environment,” said McErlean who will be navigated by James Fulton, another graduate of the programme. “It’s now full speed ahead into WRC Portugal and it’s great to have James back by my side. We know Portugal can turn into a game of survival at times, so we have to use our heads as always and manage any situations presented to us. But it feels like a long time coming and I can’t wait to get stuck into the thick of it at the  weekend.”

 Creighton is dovetailing his WRC2 programme with an assault on the British Rally Championship. He said: “This is my first WRC event on gravel in the Rally2 car, we did the Severn Valley [British Rally Championship round] a couple of weeks ago which was  fantastic. I have done Portugal twice before; it is an event I always look forward to. The weather looks good for the rally week so it is going to be warm which is  another factor to consider inside the car. I am looking forward to another rally with M Sport and  continuing to build on our WRC 2 campaign. We have good speed on tarmac so  we just need to work on trying to translate that speed on to  the gravel.”

 Vodafone Rally de Portugal offers over 337 kilometres of special stages, spread across four days. Thursday [9 May] houses the opening super special stage, before Friday’seight tests, separated by just one tyre fitting zone. Saturday is the longest of the rally at 145 kilometres, before Sunday’s four tests, including the world-famous Fafe stage, to round out the weekend.


Related articles





Source link

At the general election, politicians must rally around a ‘next generation NHS' – Politics.co.uk

0


We don’t know yet when a general election will take place but one thing is certain – the National Health Service will feature large in the political battle of ideas.

We need a frank and honest debate about the future of the NHS.

More than one in three people (35 per cent) are concerned about the NHS according to a recent Ipsos poll, almost neck-and-neck with the economy as a top concern. Public satisfaction with the NHS is at an all-time low, hit by people’s experience of the relentless pressure on GPs, hospitals, ambulances and mental health and community health services. The NHS is facing some of the toughest conditions yet as it seeks to manage rising demand and complexity.

But public support for the fundamental principles of the NHS remains rock-solid.

In A picture of health: delivering the next generation NHS trust leaders set out a vision of how government and health services can work together to maximise the social and economic value of the NHS.

The NHS is the keystone in the health of our nation. A healthy economy relies on a healthy population, and NHS spending is good for growth. Every £1 spent on healthcare returns £4 in increased productivity and employment.

To help realise those benefits and to navigate the years ahead, leaders of trusts across England have set out a pre-election prescription for the ‘next generation’ NHS.

This is designed to champion and protect the NHS while reflecting the challenges it faces, highlighting five shared commitments for politicians and health service leaders. We can create a national picture of health by working together. We need to: reaffirm commitment to the core values of the NHS to improve health and care for all and reduce inequalities; build a new infrastructure programme for the NHS; nurture a thriving health and care workforce; champion a culture of openness, improvement and innovation; and provide care in the right place at the right time.

Demand for health and social care services is increasing and becoming more complex as providers and staff work tirelessly to give patients safe, effective care in challenging circumstances.

The plan shows how joined-up action with government can create a healthy, equitable and productive society for years to come. Politicians must take responsibility not just for treating sick people but commit to supporting the overall health of an ageing population, with cross-government action and accountability.

People are the backbone of the NHS. Today there are more than 110,000 jobs across the NHS in England unfilled. We must ensure that the NHS recruits and retains people with the right skills and in the right places, equipped with the modern facilities and technologies that they need to deliver high-quality, safe care. NHS staff need support and positive workplace cultures to provide the best possible experiences and outcomes for patients.

Current capital allocations aren’t enough to cover the cost of safety-critical repairs to NHS estates and equipment with an £11bn-plus backlog of essential work waiting to be done. We need to widen access to strategic capital investment and enable trusts to use the money they already have by increasing national capital departmental expenditure limits (CDELs).

Actions which government and the NHS must take together include also prioritising an open, learning culture across the healthcare system to improve safety and quality of care and investing in the skills needed for continuous improvement. Trusts working with Integrated Care Systems are well placed to play a strategic convening role, supporting development and provision of services right for the communities they serve.

We must rally around our ‘next generation’ NHS, one which serves the population as it is now and will be rather than as it was when founded in 1948. An NHS which is agile in deploying its people, its resources, its partnerships, its technology. An NHS which is responsive to health needs but which is not solely responsible for them. An NHS which wins the trust of the people it serves, which helps drive national productivity and excellence, and which government and parliament can robustly hold to account and endorse.

While we wait for the general election starting gun to be fired, then after the drama of election night is done and the TV crews have packed up and gone, we urge politicians to work hand in hand with us, with patients and communities at the heart of the conversation, to create the picture of health we all want to see.

Politics.co.uk is the UK’s leading digital-only political website, providing comprehensive coverage of UK politics. Subscribe to our daily newsletter here.





Source link

Abigail Lapell – Anniversary

0


Following last year’s Lullabies album, Toronto songstress Abigail Lapell returns to her own material for Anniversary, an album of love songs variously inspired by turning 40, the fifteenth anniversary of her father’s passing and several family weddings and births. She addresses the romantic ideal of growing old together, tracking the revolving days, seasons and years in reflecting the notion of eternal love and the attendant dichotomies of light and dark, love and loss, such as the wedding vows ‘in sickness and health and for richer or poorer’.

Recorded in a 200-year-old Ontario church adjoining a cemetery (and using the in-house harpsichord on the opener) with Great Lake Swimmers frontman Tony Dekker as co-producer as well as featuring on three tracks, a mix of folksy and orchestral country-jazz arrangements, it begins, her vocals double-tracked, with the sort of title track, Anniversary Song and lyrics celebrating the symbolism of commitment as, playing on the idea of chemistry,  they overlay traditional anniversary gifts with the periodic table of elements (“Will it be cotton or leather?/Mercury and iron, carbon, silver/bind us together”).

Lapell on piano, augmented by double bass, pipe organs and viola, the slowly building Bronte-esque Footsteps was inspired by her mother’s recurring dreams of her late husband coming back to the house  (“I hear the echo of your footsteps on the floor/I feel a shiver in my bones/How can I tell you you don’t live here anymore”) and the power of love to simultaneously haunt and console (“I hear you calling out my name/I light a candle in the darkness/I’m just the keeper of the flame/Keeping time as you fade to silence”).

Featuring Michael Davidson on marimba and vibraphone, echoey drums introduce the rumbling folksy Americana of Count On Me, a duetted vow of constancy with  Dekker (“Walk in sunshine walk in shadow/Where you go you know I will follow/Fortune I can only guess/A change of heart or just a change of address/I will be there”) and the brevity but sweetness of time shared (“Our joys are countless though the years are few/And all my days/I will always count on you”).

The traditional flavoured foot stomping Rattlesnake, with its distorted finger-style electric guitar, handclap percussion, and wordless wailings, is an ode to love and the superstition of omens and herbalist incantations (“Sew a penny in your shoe/Blessings on the journey/I’ll cut a lock of hair for you / And keep the fire burning…If you find a rattlesnake/Put it in your fiddle/Play it at the funeral wake/To keep away the devil”).

Lapell on harmonica and Tania Gill on barroom piano with Joe Lapinski playing pedal steel, the lovelorn Blue Blaze (“I woke up in an indigo cloud/You were long gone [my love was gone], with the faded dawn/Left me lying there, crying out loud”) has an old school prairie cowboy country slow sway that draws its lyrical inspiration from Plaisir d’amour, the line “A sad song lasts a whole life long/When the pleasure of love is so brief” expressing how music can memorialise the joy and pain of love.

Chiming guitar carries the slow-walking folk pop Someone Like You, which picks up that idea (“I’ll sing you a song that never ends/When it’s done begin again”) and comes with undercurrent themes of insecurity and endings (“When you’re gone there’s no replacement”), Lapell’s warbling evocative of a fusion of Sandy Denny and Buffy Sainte-Marie.

 Rebecca Hennessy brings trumpet to the insomnia-haunted piano hymnal 3am with its  lost love ache (“I wanna turn my life around/Maybe then we’ll meet again/Move to a different town/Or maybe you’ll call me up/You used to call me up/Just to try to calm me down/Gonna get back on my feet, gotta get back/On solid ground …I guess I’ve lived alone too long/To live any other way”)

 In musical and lyrical contrast,  again featuring Dekker, and recorded live-off-the-floor with claps and stomps Flowers In My Hair is an a capella singalong in the tradition of children’s playground songs (“I don’t need a diamond ring/Don’t need much of anything/I don’t have a thing to wear/I got flowers in my hair”), Dekker then contributing saw to the strum-along Blue Electric Skies, a haunting ballad of ambivalence and infatuation that veers between love song and breakup (“Love is impatient/Love is so unkind/The only consolation/I could ever find/It’s all I could ever find/All that could ever bind us together”) and suggests she may have a few Neil Young records in the collection. It’s also quite probably the only song to ever have the word ‘cyanotic’ in the lyrics.

After the generally acoustic and laid-back nature of the preceding tracks, she gets gnarly for Wait  Up with throaty electric guitar and Hennessy’s on trumpet for a love story that’s both dysfunctional and irresistible as she declares “I was a cold hearted bastard/With a gunmetal grin/You were a natural disaster/Rattling the door till I let you in… I was a hard-headed hypocrite/You a two-faced/two-faced layabout/I don’t know how I can live with it/I don’t know how I can live without it”.

It ends with one more round for Dekker on vocals, with the again hymnal Stars, a stripped back guitar and piano companion to I Can’t Believe on 2022’s Stolen Time, a dreamily romantic image of staring up at the night sky stars (“One for every song I wish I’d sung/Every love I’ve never known”) with the one you love (“I know you’re here now beside me dear/And I’ll never sing alone… there is no place I’d rather be, nothing I would rather do/Than to hold you tight on an August night and count the stars with you”).

With music and songs such as these, let’s hope that albums by Abigail Lapell will continue to be an annual event.

Anniversary – 10th May 2024 on Outside Music – https://ffm.to/anniversary



Source link

Josienne Clarke – Parenthesis, I

0


Parenthesis, I, Josienne Clarke’s latest album, follows on from last year’s Onliness, with the musicians involved in that release lending their support once again on this collection of new material: Alec Bowman-Clarke on bass, Dave Hamblett on drums, and Matt Robinson on keyboards. Josienne plays guitar, clarinet, recorder, and saxophone.

The songs are often deeply confessional, albeit couched in oblique and metaphorical imagery, a case in point being the airy, shuffling opener Friendly Teeth, a song about needing people to be honest with her (“there’s nothing more ugly than lies upon lies upon lies… I’ve been everyone’s fool/And lies are the harshest cruelty”), about making her own decisions (“An ounce of trepidation in my step/With a slight discomfort in my zone/To leap, carefully, into the unknown”) and calling for a “truth so strong/That it comes right up and bites you on the shoulder with its friendly teeth”.

Geometry has its place in her store of images, the carousel rhythm of Spherical exploring getting back to herself (“I’ve been drawing a circle/Back to myself/So slowly it looked like a line/That I went way off/Faraway from the place/That I started”), picking up the notion that in my end is my beginning, but also drawing on magical ideas of protection (“I’ve been drawing a circle/Around myself/To keep from the dangerous/Dark eclipsing/Circling round the doubt/A ring/To never let in or give out”, capturing the sense of both being safe but also trapped within such defences.

Just voice and watery fingerpicked guitar, while influences such as  Nick Drake, Sandy Denny and Anaïs Mitchell are often cited, Fear Of Falling also casts her as a pastoral folk prototype for newcomers such as Katherine Priddy and Flo Perlin, though it also filters the Americana colours of Courtney Marie Andrews in a song about leaving the past behind and embracing the future (not flying for fear of falling), the lyrics peppered with imagery drawn from her new home on the Isle of Bute (“The birds are singing brightly in the tall trees of Skeoch wood/And scarcely I believed that peace of mind in life could be as good”).

Of a jazzier persuasion, Do You Know Now?, with its nervy, neurotic keyboard pulse, is an exorcism of sorts as she sings, “There’s no blood and no bone/To connect me to you/No familiar, no friend/Every contact cut or ended… do you know now/That no part of me/Is a part of you”, whether that’s disconnecting from a person or a mental state. Coloured with sax, Looking Glass sustains that cool, jazzy vibe to a song that conjures a composed detachment (“Poised and precise/Glass and ice/Always be nice/Just a slice, a sliver/Fine on the eye/I can reliably refine/What you like”) while the plucked electric guitar figure and glacial Forbearing wrings the heart with lyrics that touch on the despair of her miscarriages (“It broke my heart/‘Til I, willing to die/Could see no light/In my fruitless life”) and the way it made her feel about herself (“If damaged fruit/Is all I can give to you/That‘ll have to do… I can’t bear/Bring myself to blame myself again/It isn’t fair/We’re all taught to tear ourselves apart”).  

There’s more soul-baring on the compact, stripped-back lo-fi autobiographical Most of All, a number, the original haunted demo she describes as “a licking of wounds and counting of blessings, taking stock and setting straight in my head”, with lines like “There’s a room where everyone hangs on my every word/But in our haunted house my daddy rarely heard a word I said …My mother praised me for being truthful all my days/But I needed things that I did not say/I did not ask, did not complain/I let my wants wash away… I let the heartless make a host of me/And they plundered me for melody/Left me not a note to sing”, again exposing the raw nerve of her miscarriages (“Maybe I won’t be no one’s mother in the end/I took the pills, the potions and the vitamins/But I could not keep my darlings in”), though for all that, it’s ultimately a song of defiance (“I will not live my life in pain/If I can’t see the way on any given day/I’ll take a breath and look again”) and finding peace (“My lover loves me most of all/He can write a beautiful love song but he can barely sing at all”).

Though just under two minutes, Double-Edged Sword, with its repeated rippling guitar pattern, is one of the album’s most complex tracks with its double-tracked vocals, keyboard drone and full band on another defiant note and refusal to surrender (“Bring me a double edged sword, and I’ll show you an iron will …My ability to stay alive’s my only power”). Featuring jazzy piano, things turn to a soulful folk persuasion on the upfront love song that is Firecracker (“You’re a loose cannon baby and I’m a firecracker/What a beautiful mess we make/Leaving dust in our wake/Laying waste to it all”) that echoes Neil Young’s better to burn out than fade away credo  (“Like moths to a flame/Drowning in shame/We’re losing every game/Cos we’d rather find out/Excluding all doubt/And go brightly burning out …As we spoil for a fight/And triumph overall”).

The longest track, opening with simple distant piano notes and scuffed drums before the repeated sparse guitar motif, A Dead Woman’s Bones is also the closest she lyrically gets to a traditional folk number (“He plays a song/On a lute he made/Its pure tone/Made of dead woman’s bones/The tune he plays/Are the notes he stole/And those words/Such lovely words/Such poetry/A dead woman’s poems”) though you’re unlikely to find anything like “His literal hand on her metaphorical throat” in the Cecil Sharp library.

It hits the last lap with piano and fingerpicked The Calm with its whisperingly sung sense of having survived the vicissitudes (“When all’s said and done/Under the sun/You can’t kill me/I won/So getting stronger/Has begun… Growing the sweetest of roses from the thorns/Going the closest to breaking, being reborn”) as it quietly builds and soars before ebbing away.

Accompanied by keyboard drone, the slow walking rhythm title track provides the penultimate number with its theme of recovery, living life outside the imprisoning brackets (“Parenthesis, I (think I) am done with you…put cessation in its place and face down the demon/Now darkness is only an absence of light in its space/To keep staring into the void/Re-wounding indefinitely is a choice/I choose not to make/A path it didn’t take/Undestroyed”), where “There are windows to open/A curtain to draw/To let hope out the building/Let the winds roar through the halls”.

It ends, then, with the brushed drums, piano,  circling guitar and soaring background choral vocals of  Magic, Somehow, a reaffirmation of what the power of a song can do for those who hear it (“Sing us one of your sad songs/The one about love/Make it make us give in and never give up… Sing us one of your sad songs/The one about time/Make us die on the inside/And feel so alive/Tell us the world is illusion/But you know the truth/Say it’s beautiful, show us proof”). The album an affirmation that out of the deepest darkness sometimes comes the brightest light, to paraphrase her lyric, Clarke spins her alchemy, she gives us hope.

Parenthesis, I is released on 9th May 2024 on Corduroy Punk.
https://josienneclarke.bandcamp.com/album/parenthesis-i



Source link

Selling off the summer? Why Hundred plans should matter to all cricket lovers | Barney Ronay


Why should anyone be worried about the England and Wales Cricket Board’s plan to sell its stake in the eight Hundred franchise teams to private investors? A deadline for counties to agree to a “direction of travel” on this issue has been set for Friday. The governing body’s preferred direction appears clear enough. The intention seems to be to sell English cricket’s chief domestic revenue levers as quickly as possible. Most likely this will be to the existing owners of Indian Premier League franchises. IPL owners already have teams in the US, the United Arab Emirates and South Africa. So why not here?

To date nobody with any kind of platform in the game seems overly concerned about this prospect. We have seen no breaking of ranks among administrators, no big‑ticket media names pointing to the potential pitfalls, no European Super League-style protests on the streets.

So maybe it’s just fine. County cricket is broke. Private equity is rich. It sounds like a natural fit, like hammers and nails, predator and prey, greed and hubris. This is “money coming into the game”, to use the generically evasive phrase. And who doesn’t like money? So why does it feel like what is happening here is the first step in outsourcing the English cricket summer, in privatising the month of August? Welcome to Selling England By The Pound, Part 74: Domestic Cricket. At the very least, we need to talk about this.

It is a complex process, but one that involves a pretty simple first step. Under the current proposals the ECB would sell its 49% stake in all eight Hundred teams. This was initially advertised as just 30%. Two weeks before Friday’s meeting the ECB upped this to the full stake. It seems potential buyers will want the lot. Investment without control is a much less interesting deal. This is an important detail. Under this arrangement the eight host counties will retain a 51% stake in their in-house franchise. Anti‑alarmists will point to this, rightly, as evidence that control is not being ceded. The counties still have the majority share. It’s all fine.

On the other hand, it is also hard to imagine how this will remain the case. Private equity is rich. County cricket clubs are poor. Venture capitalists don’t really want a 49% share in anything. They want to control the direction of their investment, and to do so without interference from Sir Bufton Ballsack, who may well be a stalwart of the county board but knows very little about harvesting eyeballs. How many counties, outside of Surrey, are in a position to resist the lure of free money in return for conceding the casting vote?

Never mind, though. The ECB still owns the actual competition! At least, in so much as the competition exists outside the teams that play in it. Like the UK government, it still owns the track and points. It’s just the trains that other people get to run. And look how well that’s worked out. Bring on the Avanti West Coast Invincibles.

The Hundred has divided English cricket, requiring every other format to be subjugated and run down. Photograph: Alex Davidson/ECB/Getty Images

The ECB is not a public body, but privatisation is still a useful model here. The ECB is the keeper of our shared sporting heritage. It also receives public funding. As such it should be open to public scrutiny. When the veteran Labour MP John Spellar says the government should call the ECB in to review this process, he may not be speaking as a cricket man, but he does know where the sale of assets to private equity can lead. The football governance bill will regulate the sale and ownership of football clubs. Cricket has no equivalent oversight. Why not?

It is unsurprising there is already a fracture in consensus among the counties over all this. The word is there may be no agreement by Friday. The non-host counties, also known as first turkeys on the Christmas meat hook, have begun to question the deal being offered. There are windfalls and annual stipends to be divvied up. Money is being grubbed over. The heirs are gathered around the casket, arguing over the silver.

What about future investment, scheduling, facilities, conflicts of interest between national game, pathways, inclusion and the pure profit motives of a private company? Is the ECB not obliged by its basic constitution to provide protection against the takeover of the cricket calendar by franchises with an eye on global dominance? As opposed to acting as a paid facilitator? Who, right now, knows the answer to any of these things (answer: nobody)?

One problem is the obvious impediments to holding any kind of objective discussion. First the Hundred itself is an endlessly divisive entity. The good bits are clear enough. The Hundred was designed to expand the game’s reach and source newer, younger consumers. These are logical aims. Given the ECB’s own record of failure in growing the game, something had to be done. The Hundred offered the chance of a reset, for women’s teams to be given status, visibility and investment, for the junking of some old restrictive habits.

The problem is the collateral damage to all the other bits. The Hundred is unavoidably parasitic. It requires every other format to be subjugated and run down, although part of this is a deliberate managed decline to ensure its own success. People who have supported the game and kept it alive like the other formats. Test cricket is still the greatest cash cow. It is currently being asked to subsidise the thing that will cut its legs off, a Hundred that provides no players, no pathway, no midsummer stage in return.

The other problem is the ECB itself, a governing body run for so many years like a mercurial get-rich scheme, which relies on public wealth, the shared game, to produce its only assets, but still seems intent on chasing growth, eyeballs, fire sales and the most buzzword-laden version of sports capitalism. Is the sale of the Hundred franchises even with the spirit of the ECB’s remit? Its governing articles state that the ECB’s aims are to act as the governing body for cricket, to do so for the benefit of all stakeholders, to balance short‑term consequences with long-term benefit, and to promote “the commercialisation, marketing and promotion of cricket”.

skip past newsletter promotion

Well, one of these (clue: it’s the last one) is definitely the preferred option. But there are still questions to be asked. What do investors want, and why are they interested in your product? The ECB’s chosen buyer-locator is the Raine Group, whose last job in English football was introducing Chelsea to Todd Boehly. These people are not always benevolent actors. It is also worth considering why English cricket is broke when it has also never been so rich, when it can afford to pay a star player half a million pounds for playing four games a year. Where will the new money actually go, other than into debt, and the servicing of more debt?

Hence the need for basic scrutiny. One Labour MP has already suggested this process should take place in daylight. Here are some very obvious questions the ECB would do well to address before speeding ahead. The sale of Hundred franchises has been presented as an obvious net positive for English cricket. Does the ECB accept that this is also a profound existential change for domestic game? Where is the feasibility study on exactly how this could look in 10 years? What indication is there that Hundred host counties won’t instantly sell their controlling vote to the new minority investor? What is the view on the potential effects?

Labour MP John Spellar has called for the government to scrutinise the ECB’s plans to sell its stake in the Hundred teams. Photograph: Johnny Armstead/Alamy

If this asset is worth so much money, why is the ECB selling it? Outside investors may have more instant cash. Why isn’t the ECB able to monetise this while retaining control? What study has been made into the medium-term effects on non-host counties? What will be the role of, say Kent CCC, in 10 years’ time? English cricket has a lot of money and a lot of debt. Where will this new money go? Where is the evidence of how it will be spent?

Has the self interest of players, agents, broadcasters and all interested parties with a platform been excluded from consideration of the merits or otherwise of this course of action? What due diligence will be done on prospective new owners? Will you consider the motives of your buyer? Is this a material factor in the sale, or is it just the highest price?

These are all questions the ECB will, it is to be hoped, already be asking itself. A great deal more than the ever-embattled present is at stake.

  • Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.



Source link

Israeli military operations in Rafah expand – newsuk1


Israeli military operations in Rafah have escalated, bringing renewed focus to the ongoing conflict in the region. The situation in Rafah, a city located in the southern Gaza Strip, has long been a hotspot for tension and violence between Israeli forces and Palestinian militants. However, the recent escalation has raised concerns about the potential for further violence and instability in the area.

The Israeli military’s expansion of operations in Rafah comes amid heightened tensions following a series of incidents, including rocket attacks launched from Gaza into Israeli territory and retaliatory airstrikes by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). The IDF has stated that its operations in Rafah are aimed at targeting Hamas militants and destroying their infrastructure, including tunnels used for smuggling weapons and launching attacks against Israel.

However, the situation in Rafah is not simply a matter of military strategy. The city is home to thousands of Palestinian civilians who are caught in the crossfire of the conflict. Reports from humanitarian organizations paint a grim picture of the humanitarian situation in Rafah, with civilians facing shortages of essential supplies such as food, water, and medical care. The escalation of military operations only exacerbates the suffering of the civilian population and raises serious concerns about the impact on their safety and well-being.

Furthermore, the expansion of Israeli military operations in Rafah has broader implications for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a whole. The recent escalation comes at a time when efforts to revive peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority have stalled, and the prospects for a negotiated settlement seem increasingly remote. The cycle of violence and retaliation only serves to deepen the distrust and animosity between the two sides, making the prospect of peace even more elusive.

It is important to recognize that the situation in Rafah is deeply complex and rooted in decades of historical, political, and territorial disputes. The city’s location along the border between Israel and the Gaza Strip makes it particularly susceptible to violence and instability. Moreover, the presence of armed militant groups such as Hamas adds another layer of complexity to the situation, as their activities often draw a strong response from the Israeli military.

In light of these complexities, finding a sustainable solution to the conflict in Rafah and the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict will require a comprehensive approach that addresses the underlying causes of the violence and addresses the legitimate grievances of both sides. This will require meaningful engagement and dialogue between Israeli and Palestinian leaders, as well as the international community.

In the short term, efforts must be made to de-escalate tensions and prevent further violence in Rafah. This will require restraint and moderation from all parties involved, as well as a commitment to upholding international humanitarian law and protecting the rights of civilians caught in the conflict.

Ultimately, the escalation of Israeli military operations in Rafah underscores the urgent need for a renewed and concerted effort to achieve a just and lasting peace between Israel and the Palestinians. Only through genuine dialogue, negotiation, and compromise can the cycle of violence be broken, and a future of peace and prosperity for all be realized.

israel military operations in gaza:

the Gaza Strip has remained a focal point of contention and violence. Over the years, Israel has conducted numerous military operations in Gaza, each leaving a profound impact on the region’s political, social, and humanitarian dynamics. To comprehend the complexities surrounding these operations, it’s crucial to delve into their context, assess their consequences, and explore their broader implications.

Historical Context:

The roots of the Israeli military operations in Gaza can be traced back to the complex historical backdrop of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Following the Arab-Israeli War of 1948, Gaza came under Egyptian administration until the Six-Day War in 1967 when Israel gained control of the territory. Since then, Gaza has been a hotbed of conflict, marked by Palestinian resistance movements, Israeli military incursions, and political unrest.

Rationale and Objectives:

Israel’s military operations in Gaza are often framed as responses to security threats posed by Palestinian militant groups, particularly Hamas. These operations typically aim to degrade Hamas’ military capabilities, deter future attacks, and safeguard Israeli civilians. However, the extent to which these objectives are achieved is a subject of debate, with critics raising concerns about civilian casualties, infrastructure damage, and the perpetuation of the cycle of violence.

Humanitarian Concerns:

One of the most pressing issues associated with Israel’s military operations in Gaza is the humanitarian toll on the civilian population. The densely populated enclave, already grappling with poverty, unemployment, and limited access to essential services, bears the brunt of the violence. Civilian casualties, including women and children, are tragically common, fueling international condemnation and calls for accountability.

International Response:

The international community’s response to Israel’s military operations in Gaza has been varied, reflecting divergent geopolitical interests and ideological positions. While some nations, particularly Western allies of Israel, have expressed solidarity and support for its right to self-defense, others have denounced the disproportionate use of force and called for a peaceful resolution to the conflict through dialogue and diplomacy.

Long-Term Implications:

Beyond the immediate aftermath, Israel’s military operations in Gaza have far-reaching implications for the prospects of peace and stability in the region. The cycle of violence perpetuated by these operations undermines trust, exacerbates grievances, and fuels radicalization on both sides. Moreover, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza continues to deepen, posing significant challenges to efforts aimed at achieving a durable resolution to the conflict.

israel military operations in gaza:

 Israeli military operations have become a grimly familiar occurrence. Each flare-up of violence adds another chapter to a long, tangled history of geopolitical tensions, territorial disputes, and deep-rooted animosities. Understanding the dynamics of these military operations requires navigating a complex web of political, historical, and humanitarian factors.

At the heart of Israel’s military operations in Gaza lies the issue of security. Israel, a nation born out of the ashes of the Holocaust and surrounded by neighbors historically hostile to its existence, sees itself as constantly under threat. The persistent rocket attacks launched from Gaza into Israeli territory exacerbate this sense of vulnerability and compel Israeli leaders to respond forcefully in defense of their citizens.

However, the situation in Gaza is far from straightforward. Gaza, a densely populated coastal enclave, has been under blockade by Israel since 2007, following Hamas’s takeover of the territory. This blockade, along with restrictions imposed by neighboring Egypt, has led to severe humanitarian crises, with Gazans facing shortages of food, medicine, and basic necessities. The resulting desperation and suffering provide fertile ground for extremism to take root and fuel anti-Israel sentiment.

The  Israeli military operations conducted by Israel in Gaza are characterized by overwhelming force, with airstrikes and ground incursions aimed at targeting Hamas militants and infrastructure. However, the densely populated nature of Gaza means that civilian casualties are inevitable. Despite Israel’s claims of precision targeting and efforts to minimize civilian harm, the reality on the ground often tells a different story, with countless innocent lives lost and infrastructure destroyed.

READ MORE:How many times has Israel invaded Gaza?

The toll of these operations on the people of Gaza is immeasurable. Beyond the immediate loss of life and destruction of property, the psychological trauma inflicted on generations of Palestinians, particularly children, leaves deep scars that may never fully heal. The cycle of violence perpetuated by these  Israeli military operations only serves to entrench animosities further, making the prospects for lasting peace seem increasingly remote.

Critics of Israel’s military operations in Gaza argue that they amount to collective punishment, in violation of international law. They point to the disproportionate use of force, the targeting of civilian infrastructure, and the blockade’s impact on the civilian population as evidence of Israel’s disregard for human rights and international norms. Calls for accountability and justice resonate worldwide, with many demanding an end to the cycle of violence and a just resolution to the underlying conflict.

However, supporters of Israel’s actions in Gaza argue that the country has a legitimate right to self-defense and must take necessary measures to protect its citizens from terrorist threats. They highlight Hamas’s use of civilian areas for launching attacks and storing weapons, effectively using Gazans as human shields. From this perspective, Israel’s military operations are seen as a regrettable but unavoidable response to an existential threat.

Amidst the chaos and suffering of conflict, it can be easy to lose sight of the humanity at the heart of the matter. Behind the headlines and the geopolitical maneuvering are real people, living in fear and longing for peace and security. Breaking the cycle of violence will require bold leadership, genuine empathy, and a commitment to dialogue and reconciliation from all sides involved.

Israel’s military operations in Gaza are not just about tactics and strategy; they are about lives shattered and futures stolen. Until the underlying grievances and injustices fueling this conflict are addressed, the cycle of violence will continue unabated, leaving a trail of devastation in its wake. Only through genuine efforts to understand and address the root causes of the conflict can there be hope for a brighter, more peaceful future for all the peoples of the region.





Source link

Mark Mandeville & Raianne Richards – Making Promises

0


Massachusetts duo Mark Mandeville & Raianne Richards return with Making Promises, their fourth studio album, once more steeped in their close harmony folksy Americana with several stripped-back acoustic songs inspired by their marriage in 2021. Appropriately, it opens on a romantic note with the circling fingerpicked When Love Comes ‘Round Again (“it doesn’t ask to be let in, need permission, or forgiveness or fair warning to begin”),  leading to the local progression of the mandolin-flecked duetted Make A Home (“a shingle of our own, a stove to warm our bodies by and a land to reap and sow/a flame to light the darkness, a candle burning dim, a dance with every breath you’re breathin’ in”).

Raianne on lead, accompanied by mandolin and guitar, Another Day Tomorrow is about asking, “Have you tried the best you can”, learning from the past  (“what is life if not a lesson/what is time if not a gift”), looking to the future, moving on from setbacks and resolving “to be a better man”. Doubtless inspired by wedding vows, Mark steps back up for the mid-tempo Making Promises, asking what they mean and why we make them (“they make liars out of those/not strong enough to find/a means to remember/a reason from the heart/a testament we finish everything we start/to see through to the end and claim no great reward/the prize is in the going never doubt whatever for”), Raianne joining on for the final stretch.

Conjuring the air of the hot summer evening and fireflies he sings about in the first line, One Who Don’t repeats the title line for each verse as is, as the line says, about those who “don’t see the forest from trees”, a song about the need for empathy and understating in the way we approach others and the world around us. One of two numbers recorded at earlier sessions and another that uses the forest/trees image, the slow waltzing, woodwind-coloured Only A Matter Of Time with Doug Williamson on piano is, as the title suggests, about things that come around and change, for better or worse (“heads you come clean, get on with things, tails, there’s nowhere to hide…what goes up must come down and ember gets free from the flame”) and how “there’s always a price to be paid, a balance between loss and gain”.

 A bluegrass-style ballad with appropriate instrumentation, Reflecting is about the struggle to know what’s right when times get hard, “spending hours wrestling with which side is a dream and which is life” and having to “hold on to the feeling like a dim lighthouse light” when the darkness threatens to engulf you and knowing which way you end up facing having been spun around.

Hello Bill has a very specific backdrop, being a memory of and tribute to one “Shakey” Bill Rabitor, a pedal steel player and frequenter of the  Blackstone Valley Music School where Mark teaches, his nickname coming from the effects of his medication, who would recount stories from his youth (“when I pick up the banjo/I remember each time you’d recall the tale/while in the navy you learned to play guitar”), who donated his   60’s Stratocaster “for the kids to play a knock off Neil Young”, spending his last days in a veterans home, cassette tape of him rehearsing being played at the funeral.

The last of the original material,   taking its title from the Eugene O’Neill play, Long Day’s Journey Into Night is a beguilingly lovely clarinet-shaded simple folksy fingerpicked lullaby of sorts musing on mortality but not giving up  (“after all these trials/just to say we’ve had enough/seems like a fear of tryin’/when the goin’ gets tough”), it sets the scene for the closing track, the other earlier recording, with Raianne on vocals and clarinet, accompanied by Williamson’s piano and Peter Hart on pedal steel, for a rendition of Auld Lang Syne that has the musical equivalence of the peaty taste of a vintage Laphroaig. Unfussy, with no unnecessary frills, this is immaculately constructed and seamlessly played organic contemporary yet timeless folk music that comes from and speaks to the heart. The legendary music critic Robert Christgau once said, “In the worst of times, music is a promise that times are meant to be better”. Theirs is a promise they will not break.

Out on 9th May 2024 on Nobody’s Favourite Records



Source link

'The party's BAME Labour power grab would betray trust of BAME members' – LabourList

0


We live in unprecedented times.

After six months of mass slaughter in Gaza, the conflict in the Middle East has spilled over into a direct military confrontation between Israel and Iran. At the same time, the ongoing standoff between Russia and Ukraine serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of peace in Europe.

Both conflicts are international by nature. Ukraine’s resistance to Russia’s brutal occupation and Israel’s vicious occupation of the Palestinian Territories are both only possible because of the political, financial and military support of the United States and to a significant extent the United Kingdom, too.

As the world stands closer to a world wide conflict than at any point since the peak of the Cold War, it’s impossible not to recognise the inconsistencies in the UK government’s position. Why does the UK aim to protect Ukrainians, whilst aiding and abetting the massacre of Palestinians?

The double standards disturb an ever-growing number of people, of all races, nationalities and faiths. However, it is provoking particular hurt and anger amongst people of colour who understand all too well that some lives seem to count more than others. This is particularly acute amongst Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) Labour supporters, who are the bedrock of our voter base.

Government policies and rhetoric have left ethnic minorities further marginalised

Across the country, the effects of economic neglect by the UK government and its entanglement in a culture war have reverberated profoundly within BAME communities, exacerbating existing disparities and fracturing social cohesion. The government’s failure to adequately address systemic inequalities, from racial disparities in healthcare and education to discriminatory policing practices, has entrenched marginalisation and eroded trust in institutions.

Moreover, the proliferation of divisive rhetoric and policies under the guise of a culture war has fostered a climate of hostility and intolerance, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and emboldening far-right elements.

This toxic combination of not only undermines the principles of equality and inclusion but also threatens to deepen societal divisions and hinder progress towards a more just and equitable society.

Labour’s Gaza stance has lost it votes

The Labour Party has reached a pivotal crossroads in its own journey towards inclusivity and genuine representation. Recent events have underscored the urgent need for a reevaluation of its approach to Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) representation within the party.

The party has faced a significant decline in membership, a troubling trend exacerbated by controversies surrounding its stance on Gaza and green investment.

Despite holding a commanding lead in opinion polls, Labour’s refusal to call for a ceasefire and Keir Starmer’s awful LBC interview following Israel’s bombardment of Gaza in retaliation to the terrorism conducted on October 7th by Hamas led to the resignation of numerous councillors and loss of control in several councils.

This loss of support underscores the critical importance of engaging with diverse communities and ensuring their voices are heard within the party.

BAME Labour plans would betray trust of BAME members

Labour’s rulebook explicitly grants BAME members the right to self-organisation within democratic structures, akin to those available to young members and women in the party.

The decision to reintroduce BAME Labour as an alternative to these structures is a disservice to BAME members and a disregard for the party’s commitment to democracy. It risks relegating BAME representation to a mere token gesture, devoid of meaningful influence or impact.

Moreover, the party already possesses the necessary data on BAME members and has conducted multiple NEC elections to ensure their representation. To backtrack on the establishment of democratic BAME structures would not only betray the trust of BAME members but also undermine the credibility of the party’s leadership.

BAME Labour, once envisioned as a platform for BAME representation, has regrettably fallen short of its intended purpose. For years, it has been marred by internal issues.

The proposal to resurrect BAME Labour risks reverting to these past failings, undermining the progress made towards genuine inclusivity.

This is a factional power grab

As Carol Sewell, the Labour NEC BAME members’ elected representative, aptly stated, meaningful engagement with BAME members and communities has long been promised, and it is imperative that Labour honours this commitment.

Upholding the democratic structures — “something that we have demanded, fought for, and won,” as Carol states — is essential to strengthening the voice and participation of BAME members throughout the party.

The BAME structures, which have already been incorporated into the rule book and accepted at conference by members and all trade unions, shouldn’t be simply discarded, especially without any consultation with BAME members whatsoever.

BAME Labour, being a socialist society, requires BAME members to pay money to be a part of it, which is not equivalent to the self-organising nature of Young Labour, Labour Students, or Labour Women’s structures. Moreover, socialist societies like BAME Labour don’t have any trade union representation, so why would trade unions relinquish hard-won rights gained in the original BAME structures?

The only solution is to stop this factional power grab and instead adhere to the existing conference, constitutional, and rulebook-backed BAME structures allowing BAME members to self-organise, instead of attempting to control them within the confines of a fee-paid socialist society, with a long history of management issues.

BAME members can’t be taken for granted

In conclusion, Labour stands at a crucial juncture in its journey towards inclusivity and diversity. BAME members must not be taken for granted.

We need a self-organised space to ensure that issues concerning BAME communities are addressed by the party.

To truly represent the interests of all its members, the party must reject the resurrection of BAME Labour and uphold the democratic structures already established. Anything less would be a betrayal of trust and a missed opportunity to reaffirm Labour’s commitment to equality and representation for all.

If you have anything to share that we should be looking into or publishing about this or any other topic involving Labour, on record or strictly anonymously, contact us at [email protected]

Sign up to LabourList’s morning email for a briefing everything Labour, every weekday morning. 

If you can help sustain our work too through a monthly donation, become one of our supporters here.

And if you or your organisation might be interested in partnering with us on sponsored events or content, email [email protected].



Source link

Nigerians react to new 0.5% cybersecurity levy (Good idea or bad idea?)

Uproar in Nigeria as CBN has directed all banks to start deducting 0.5% of any amount you transfer electronically.They termed it “cyber security levy”

This means that Banks will charge Nigerians for cyber transfer

₦5 on every ₦1,000

₦50 on every ₦10,000

₦500 on every ₦100,000

₦5,000 on every ₦1,000,000

₦50,000 on every ₦10,000,000

₦500,000 on every ₦100,000,000

This will commence in 2 weeks time: List of exemptions from cybersecurity charges:

1. Loan disbursements and repayments

2. Salary payments

3. Intra-account transfers within the same bank or between different banks for the same customer

4. Intra-bank transfers between customers of the same bank

5. Other Financial Institutions (OFIs) instructions to their correspondent

6. banks Interbank placements

7. Banks’ transfers to CBN and vice-versa

8. Inter-branch transfers within a bank

9. Cheques clearing and settlements

10. Letters of Credits (LCs)

11. Banks’ recapitalization related funding – only bulk funds movement from collection accounts

12. Savings and deposits including transactions involving long-term investments such as Treasury Bills, Bonds, and Commercial Papers.

13. Government Social Welfare Programs transactions e.g. Pension payments

14. Non-profit and charitable transactions including donations to registered nonprofit organisations or charities.

15. Educational Institutions transactions, including tuition payments and other transaction involving schools, universities, or other educational institutions.

16. Transactions involving bank’s internal accounts such as suspense accounts, clearing accounts, profit and loss accounts, inter-branch accounts, reserve accounts, nostro and vostro accounts, and escrow accounts

INTERPOL Appoints Nigerian CP Uche , Chairman of African Heads of Cybercrime Units

The International Police Organization, INTERPOL, has appointed Nigerian Police Commissioner, CP Ifeanyi Henry Uche, as the Chairman of the African Heads of Cybercrime Units. This prestigious appointment puts CP Uche at the helm of a team comprising heads of cybercrime units from 54 African countries.

CP Uche, who is also the Commissioner of Police in charge of the Nigeria Police Force National Cyber Crime Centre (NPF-NCCC), takes over from Ratjindua Tjivikua, the outgoing head of Cybercrime from Namibia. In his acceptance speech, CP Uche emphasized the need for African countries to join forces in the fight against cybercrime.“

The high penetration rate of new technologies in Africa exposes our cyberspace to potential targets for cybercriminals,” CP Uche warned “We must leverage INTERPOL’s communication network and existing capabilities to share classified intelligence and establish specialized cybercrime units.”

He also advocated for the establishment of an African Incident Response Mechanism and Cybersecurity Frameworks on a Police-to-Police basis, harping on the need for investment in technology, infrastructure, and capacity building to address the growing threat of cybercrime.

The Minister of State, Police Affairs, Hajia Imaan Suleiman Ibrahim, congratulated CP Uche on his appointment and reiterated the Nigerian government’s commitment to reforming the police force and enhancing cybersecurity capabilities.

As Chairman, CP Uche has pledged to lead from the front, fostering collaboration among member units to enhance their collective ability to prevent and investigate cybercrimes effectively in Africa.

Verified by MonsterInsights