Thirty-seven State-owned artworks that have gone missing range in value between â¬100 and â¬1,150, according to the Office of Public Works (OPW), which manages the collection.
A spokesman said the majority are priced at under â¬500. However, he declined to release details of the individual works because the âcollection audit process is still ongoingâ and it âwould be premature to release detailsâ before the process âis fully completeâ.
The comments follow revelations in a parliamentary reply to Social Democrats Kildare North TD Aidan Farrelly the 37 works were âunlocatedâ. They are part of the State art collection of 13,500 paintings, sculpture and other works on display in almost 500 buildings.
Mr Farrelly said, however, âif there are 37 pieces missing from an audit of 2,600 and they have a total of 13,500 in their collection, itâs probably reasonable to expect thereâs potentially up to a few hundred pieces unlocated if not more than that â essentially missingâ.
Minister of State for the OPW Kevin âBoxerâ Moran said the collection is managed by the OPWâs Art Management Office, and â19 in-person collection audits and 37 digital collections audits were undertaken in 2025â.
Some 2,633 pieces were audited and âfrom these collection audits, 37 artworks were categorised on the collection management system as unlocatedâ.
He described the collection as a âunique cultural entityâ including works âof historic significance and contemporary works by emerging artists in the early stages of their careersâ.
Mr Moran said âevery artwork in the State Art Collection is given a unique number and photographed before it is placed on display in client buildingsâ.
Once an artwork âis noted as unlocated, the Art Management Office engages with clients in the relevant building to identify the current location.
âThe Art Management Office also conducts a further analysis into the record history of unlocated artworks, including the length of time for which they remain unaccounted for, with the purpose of locating the works.â
There is no policy to value the collection financially as a whole and this is in line with other national collections, he said.
âFinancial valuations are only undertaken on individual artworks where there is a need to insure them when they are placed on loan to external third parties or exhibitions.
âThe value of the State art collection is measured by its cultural and heritage significance, not its financial value, and therefore fluctuations in the art market do not alter its value.â
Mr Farrelly said âit makes no sense to me that theyâre not having a valuation on that. Thereâs an intrinsic value to these pieces, irrespective of whether theyâre in State ownership or third-party ownership.
âIf these pieces were robbed from an OPW site, am I wrong to assume that theyâre not insured while theyâre on an OPW premises. The valuation is only taken when theyâre put out to a third party, for insurance purposes.â
He expressed concern, âif you donât have a valuation on them and you canât keep stock of them or a percentage of them maybe itâs time to reach out to people who have a specific expertise in thisâ.
He asked, âdoes it stop with the art work? When it comes to the OPW or any other State body, if thereâs an issue in one area, does this extend to vehicles in their stock? Does it extend to IT infrastructure in their stock?â
The OPW spokesman said, âaccording to best practice collection management standards, financial valuations should not generally be applied to public collections as a while.
âThe State art collection is a unique and irreplaceable asset whose intrinsic value lies in its cultural and social significance.â

